On Tue, Nov 02, 1999 at 12:45:07AM -0500, Mark Baker wrote:
> At 01:56 PM 11/1/99 -0500, Sally Khudairi wrote:
> >Our revised site -- embedded site within a single page -- will be up probably
>
> Whoa, major step backwards!
>
> I like the responsiveness, but is it really a good thing that some/all of
> the individual "pages" don't have URLs and that the whole thing is one big
> Turing-complete script?! How is this better than using an applet (modulo
> that the script is generated from a tool - it could just as easily have
> generated Java bytecodes for an applet)?
>
> What happened to "everything that matters has a URI", declaration before
> automation, and all that other good Web stuff? What do search engines
> think of content published in this way?
>
> If you did this to teach me a lesson for nit-picking about the single use
> of "font" in the XHTML version, ok, lesson learned. Now switch back.
> Fast. Please! 8-)
>
> MB
>
-- jesse reed vincent -- jrvincent@wesleyan.edu -- jesse@fsck.com pgp keyprint: 50 41 9C 03 D0 BC BC C8 2C B9 77 26 6F E1 EB 91 -------------------------------------------------------------- And I'm told we do share some common rituals. Our "flame war" is apparently held in person in their land and called "project meeting". -Alan Cox [on "Suits"]