Re: XML / XSL vs. [x]HTML / WML / etc. etc.

Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

From: Dave Winer (dave@userland.com)
Date: Thu Sep 28 2000 - 19:02:15 PDT

Clay Basket?

Did I read that right??

Dave

----- Original Message -----
From: "Bill Humphries" <bill@whump.com>
To: "Robert S. Thau" <rst@ai.mit.edu>
Cc: <fork@xent.com>
Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2000 6:43 PM
Subject: Re: XML / XSL vs. [x]HTML / WML / etc. etc.

> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Robert S. Thau <rst@ai.mit.edu>
> Subject: Re: XML / XSL vs. [x]HTML / WML / etc. etc.
>
>
> > Well, there's setext (structured enhanced text) ---
> > http://www.bsdi.com/setext/
>
> I've been kicking around a perverted little idea of writing an Xalan
> extension which takes a text node marked up in one of the alternative
markup
> languages such as setext, bare bones markup language, and Clay Basket and
> munges it into a well-formed XHTML fragment.
>
> I admit half the fun of doing this would be because it's a way of
> confronting Jorn Barger's complaints about XML/SGML for marking up prose
> text.
>
> -- whump (I yank the Web through the eye of a needle, ooh, what a mess.)
>

Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Sep 28 2000 - 19:05:18 PDT