RE: XML / XSL vs. [x]HTML / WML / etc. etc.

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Meltsner, Kenneth (Kenneth.Meltsner@ca.com)
Date: Thu Sep 28 2000 - 18:52:56 PDT

Next message: Dave Winer: "Re: XML / XSL vs. [x]HTML / WML / etc. etc."
Previous message: Bill Humphries: "Re: XML / XSL vs. [x]HTML / WML / etc. etc."
Maybe in reply to: Ship, Howard: "XML / XSL vs. [x]HTML / WML / etc. etc."
Next in thread: Tony Finch: "Re: XML / XSL vs. [x]HTML / WML / etc. etc."
Next in thread: Karl Anderson: "Re: XML / XSL vs. [x]HTML / WML / etc. etc."
Reply: Tony Finch: "Re: XML / XSL vs. [x]HTML / WML / etc. etc."

It looks like StructuredText is ZWiki/Zope thing, which makes a lot of sense
-- Ward Cunningham's Wiki had a lot of good tricks for embedding
presentation in plain text.

Check out

http://dev.zope.org/Wikis/DevSite/Proposals/StructuredText

Ken

Next message: Dave Winer: "Re: XML / XSL vs. [x]HTML / WML / etc. etc."
Previous message: Bill Humphries: "Re: XML / XSL vs. [x]HTML / WML / etc. etc."
Maybe in reply to: Ship, Howard: "XML / XSL vs. [x]HTML / WML / etc. etc."
Next in thread: Tony Finch: "Re: XML / XSL vs. [x]HTML / WML / etc. etc."
Next in thread: Karl Anderson: "Re: XML / XSL vs. [x]HTML / WML / etc. etc."
Reply: Tony Finch: "Re: XML / XSL vs. [x]HTML / WML / etc. etc."

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Sep 28 2000 - 18:56:33 PDT