RE: XML / XSL vs. [x]HTML / WML / etc. etc.

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: S. Mike Dierken (mike@knownow.com)
Date: Fri Sep 29 2000 - 09:22:22 PDT

Next message: lane becker: "Re: DaveNet and FoRK"
Previous message: Dave Winer: "DaveNet and FoRK"
In reply to: Meltsner, Kenneth: "RE: XML / XSL vs. [x]HTML / WML / etc. etc."

> Or should I just write a filter that grovels through the XML, looks

'Grovel', that's funny, because you guys are talking about groves.

Mike

Next message: lane becker: "Re: DaveNet and FoRK"
Previous message: Dave Winer: "DaveNet and FoRK"
In reply to: Meltsner, Kenneth: "RE: XML / XSL vs. [x]HTML / WML / etc. etc."

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Sep 29 2000 - 09:26:18 PDT