From: S. Mike Dierken (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Mon Sep 18 2000 - 14:38:55 PDT
> I fully agree. I think the key word you use here is "canonical".
> That is the word we are looking at as well.
I was actually looking at two DTD's - one a 'raw' format, and one with more
granularity for simpler processing engines.
The raw one would be pretty straightforward, but the more granular one would
be tricky to decide which pieces of data were properties worthwhile enough
to be exposed.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Sep 18 2000 - 14:43:28 PDT