My question: what sort of backing would people like to see in an ideal
currency?
While the idea of non-national currency is interesting, I would want
to be convinced that there was a good chance that my wealth held in
such a currency would be useful (i.e. accepted by others), and would
also want to make sure that it could not be manipulated or inflated
away by the powers that be (one of the big reasons that I like the
idea of non-national currencies in the first place). So, I'm not
about to buy { digicash | cybercash | IBM } denominated currency any
time soon (which is not to say that I wouldn't buy US denominated
digital cash).
While day-dreaming economies for a science-fiction story a while back,
I thought of shares of stock being used as a general currency, with
individuals choosing to diversify their wealth into multiple
securities. Of course, in such are scenario third parties (mutual
funds) would be willing to undertake the diversification task for
people.
Shares have the problem that they are not divisible enough for most
purposes. Mutual funds or other synthetic devices win again, because
it's possible to exchange 1/10th of a share, because there is a
repository for the fractional shares. However, MFs lose because of
management fees, and because the majority of them underperform the S&P
500.
So, what remains? I personally like the idea of Spiders (as I
understand it, synthetic S&P shares).
Any arguments for a better basis for non-national currency?
TJIC
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
To unsubscribe from the dcsb list, send a letter to: Majordomo@ai.mit.edu
In the body of the message, write: unsubscribe dcsb
Or, to subscribe, write: subscribe dcsb
If you have questions, write to me at Owner-DCSB@ai.mit.edu