What pattern was being proven? That the President has extramarital sex
--- perfectly legal, and not material to the case in question except in
some mushy "character" way --- or that the President has a pattern of
sexual harrassment? The questioning pertained to the former, which
isn't relevant and shouldn't IMO have been allowed by the judge. The
questioning should have been directed towards the latter, which would
have obviated the first *and* been material. The judge screwed up,
bottom line.
jb