Re: Seems as if fork would beat spam...

From: Tony Finch (dot@dotat.at)
Date: Mon Nov 20 2000 - 23:16:07 PST

• Next message: Gregory Alan Bolcer: "goner"
• Previous message: ab.green@olemail.com: "As read on USA Today"
• In reply to: Lorin Rivers: "Re: Seems as if fork would beat spam..."
• Next in thread: Joseph S. Barrera III: "RE: Seems as if fork would beat spam..."
• Reply: Joseph S. Barrera III: "RE: Seems as if fork would beat spam..."

Lorin Rivers <lrivers@realsoftware.com> wrote:
>
>Perhaps I was being too coy. Half the spam I get comes via FORK. I
>wish that the FoRK email servers would not let scum-sucking spammers
>use them as tools.

We could feed spammers to spammers.

Tony.

-- 
f.a.n.finch     dot@dotat.at     fanf@covalent.net     Chad for President!

• Next message: Gregory Alan Bolcer: "goner"
• Previous message: ab.green@olemail.com: "As read on USA Today"
• In reply to: Lorin Rivers: "Re: Seems as if fork would beat spam..."
• Next in thread: Joseph S. Barrera III: "RE: Seems as if fork would beat spam..."
• Reply: Joseph S. Barrera III: "RE: Seems as if fork would beat spam..."

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Nov 22 2000 - 17:18:55 PST