RE: Humans may be monogamous

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Joseph S. Barrera III (joe@barrera.org)
Date: Fri Nov 17 2000 - 18:19:28 PST

Next message: Jeff Bone: "Re: [CNN] Bush 2,909,465; Gore 2,907,722."
Previous message: Grlygrl201@aol.com: "NM Precedent"
In reply to: Mike Masnick: "Humans may be monogamous"
Next in thread: Tony Finch: "Re: Humans may be monogamous"
Reply: Tony Finch: "Re: Humans may be monogamous"

> Do we get to go back to 100 message/day arguments on who gets
> to sleep with who now?

whom

Next message: Jeff Bone: "Re: [CNN] Bush 2,909,465; Gore 2,907,722."
Previous message: Grlygrl201@aol.com: "NM Precedent"
In reply to: Mike Masnick: "Humans may be monogamous"
Next in thread: Tony Finch: "Re: Humans may be monogamous"
Reply: Tony Finch: "Re: Humans may be monogamous"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Nov 17 2000 - 18:54:00 PST