RE: [CNN] Bush 2,909,465; Gore 2,907,722.

From: Joseph S. Barrera III (joe@barrera.org)
Date: Wed Nov 08 2000 - 19:13:23 PPET

• Next message: Tom Whore: "nader traitors"
• Previous message: Antoun Nabhan: "Re: apple Sauced again"
• In reply to: Adam Rifkin: "[CNN] Bush 2,909,465; Gore 2,907,722."
• Next in thread: Tom Whore: "RE: [CNN] Bush 2,909,465; Gore 2,907,722."
• Reply: Tom Whore: "RE: [CNN] Bush 2,909,465; Gore 2,907,722."
• Reply: Mb: "Re: [CNN] Bush 2,909,465; Gore 2,907,722."

> As of right now, the U.S. president election depends
> on a swing of 1800 votes. Incredible. So this is what
> all those stories of JFK in 1960 must have been like...

What's also amazing is that not only would Nader's votes
have tipped the balance, but pretty much *any* of the
third party candidates' votes would have!!!

(Not that I can see many Buchanan voters voting for Gore...)

http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2000/results/FL/

Candidates Votes
    Bush 2,909,176 49 %
    Gore 2,907,451 49 %
    Nader 96,837 2 %
    Browne 18,856 0 %
    Buchanan 17,356 0 %
    Phillips 4,280 0 %
    Hagelin 2,287 0 %

• Next message: Tom Whore: "nader traitors"
• Previous message: Antoun Nabhan: "Re: apple Sauced again"
• In reply to: Adam Rifkin: "[CNN] Bush 2,909,465; Gore 2,907,722."
• Next in thread: Tom Whore: "RE: [CNN] Bush 2,909,465; Gore 2,907,722."
• Reply: Tom Whore: "RE: [CNN] Bush 2,909,465; Gore 2,907,722."
• Reply: Mb: "Re: [CNN] Bush 2,909,465; Gore 2,907,722."

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Nov 08 2000 - 19:18:46 PPET