Dave
At 02:13 PM 11/30/99 -0500, Jesse wrote:
>There is _nothing wrong_ with publishing one's protocols as informational
>RFCs. Would you rather that they not publish at all?
>
>
>
>On Tue, Nov 30, 1999 at 01:56:01PM -0500, Balachander Krishnamurthy wrote:
>>
>> evil empire has only 3 of 5 people on SOAP draft submitted mid-sept (not
new)
>> and it is meant to be informational rfc, not in standards track which
>> just means that ee wants to cover itself with ietf window dressing
>> rather than co-operating/standardizing.
>>
>> cheers,
>> bala
>>
>>
>
>--
>jesse reed vincent -- jrvincent@wesleyan.edu -- jesse@fsck.com
>pgp keyprint: 50 41 9C 03 D0 BC BC C8 2C B9 77 26 6F E1 EB 91
>--------------------------------------------------------------
>Emacs is a pretty good operating system, but Unix has a better editor.
>
--- David Crook - davec@commwerks.com CommWerks - Industrial Strength Internet Solutions