Actually I think that RMS and Perens both have a valid point. Either the
source is "open" and you are giving it away or you aren't. Simple
distinction. Apple put restrictions on the license saying that they can
revoke the license to use the code. If apple can tell people to stop using
the software then it wasn't a gift, then its not open source. Apple can
make up some new term for it if they like, like the "Improve our software
for free and we'll tell you that you're screwed" license. But its not open
source.
BTW, I don't particularly like the open-source advocates or their slashdot
posting wanna-be minions. I really don't trust people who describe their
job as "Evangelist" unless they work in a church. But for this they have a
point.
Dave
--- David Crook - davec@commwerks.com CommWerks - Industrial Strength Internet Solutions