Re: Scheme's Infinitely Deep Zen (was Re: Python's future bright?)

Jeff Bone (jbone@activerse.com)
Fri, 25 Jun 1999 17:42:42 -0500

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Gregory Alan Bolcer: "[Stupid Idea Series: SPAM Mastication FUD]"
Previous message: Jeff Bone: "Scheme's Infinitely Deep Zen (was Re: Python's future bright?)"
Maybe in reply to: Jeff Bone: "Scheme's Infinitely Deep Zen (was Re: Python's future bright?)"
Next in thread: John M. Klassa: "Re: Scheme's Infinitely Deep Zen (was Re: Python's future bright?)"

Having said that, though, I'll concede that Scheme's Lisp origins put it
at a sort of disadvantage with most folks in this industry... hence,
I'm pretty bullish on Python these days, as you get pretty far down the
road with it.

If anyone's interested in a particularly thoughtful and detailed
comparison of lots of programming languages on several dimensions, check
out:

http://www.lib.uchicago.edu/keith/crisis/

Next message: Gregory Alan Bolcer: "[Stupid Idea Series: SPAM Mastication FUD]"
Previous message: Jeff Bone: "Scheme's Infinitely Deep Zen (was Re: Python's future bright?)"
Maybe in reply to: Jeff Bone: "Scheme's Infinitely Deep Zen (was Re: Python's future bright?)"
Next in thread: John M. Klassa: "Re: Scheme's Infinitely Deep Zen (was Re: Python's future bright?)"