> It has lots of cool sophisticated stuff, but if you attempt to
> use it seriously, you discover it isn't sufficiently reliable
> and rounded out for production use, instead it appears the result
So, in your opinion, does NeXT's use of Mach support or refute your
argument?
Joseph S. Barrera III
{allegra,ihnp4,decvax}!microsoft!joebar
<http://research.microsoft.com/~joebar/>
The opinions expressed in this message are my own personal views.