Undeliverable: Re: NT5
-- Ernie "Cheap Shot" Prabhakar
From: System Administrator <postmaster@appmethods.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Jul 1998 14:31:19 -0700
To: "@xent.ics.uci.edu":@xent.ics.uci.edu:prabhaka@scv4.apple.com
Subject: Undeliverable: Re: NT5 slips to summer 99, according to the
Econo mist
X-Priority: 3
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.0.1458.49)
Your message
To: Rohit Khare
Cc: FoRK@xent.ics.uci.edu
Subject: Re: NT5 slips to summer 99, according to the Economist
Sent: Tue, 7 Jul 1998 14:23:03 -0700
did not reach the following recipient(s):
markk@appmethods.com on Tue, 7 Jul 1998 14:31:19 -0700
Unable to deliver the message due to a communications failure
MSEXCH:IMS:Application Methods, Inc:AM:SPIDERMAN 0 (000C05A6)
Unknown Recipient
From: Ernest Prabhakar <prabhaka@apple.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Jul 1998 14:23:03 -0700
To: Rohit Khare <rohit@fdr.ics.uci.edu>
Subject: Re: NT5 slips to summer 99, according to the Economist
Cc: FoRK@xent.ics.uci.edu
X-Priority: 3
X-MS-Embedded-Report:
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.0.1458.49)
>>Does it even matter anymore? On one hand, it's a rolling release
system, with pile-on service packs that force ever-more features onto
the base (see security admin's complaints that to fix lame NTLM auth
bugs, they have to install a patch that... adds IE!). On the other,
there's no significant horserace to win. It's not like the
once-projected Taligent vs. OpenStep vs Cairo battle the pre-Web 90's
predicted, is it?<<
Actually, over here we're starting to look at NT 6.0 (God knows how
many years out that is), also known as NTC for Consumer. That is
expected to the ultimate competition for Mac OS X (probably XX by
then:).
>>But "such tinkering is not expected to offset" jack squat. After all,
Taligent and OpenStep are dead; MacOS X will be selling into an
installed base even smaller than Linux's; and Linux, for that matter,
may be industrial-strength, multiplatform, and easy to install<<
No comment. :-)
-- Ernie P.