-> >A Press Release from the Law Offices of Michael Kennedy
-> >
-> >For Immediate Release
-> >
-> >DEA FINALLY CONFIRMS THE EXISTENCE OF SUFFICIENT GROUNDS TO REMOVE
-> >MARIJUANA FROM HARD DRUGS SCHEDULE OF CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES
-> >
-> >DEA REFERS MARIJUANA RESCHEDULING PETITION TO HHS
-> >
-> >Introduction
-> >
-> >Recent scientific evidence has forced the US Government through its
-> >Justice Department agency, the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), to
-> >commence legally binding procedures that will likely result in the end of
-> >marijuana prohibition.
-> >
-> >On December 19th, DEA formally asked the Department of Health and Human
-> >Services to conduct "a scientific and medical evaluation of the available
-> >data and provide a scheduling recommendation" for marijuana and other
-> >cannabinoid drugs. This DEA request of HHS means that the DEA has for the
-> >first time made its own determination that sufficient grounds exist to
-> >remove marijuana from Schedule I of the Controlled Substances Act (CSA).
-> >Schedule I is supposed to be limited to hard drugs with addictive
-> >propensities and with no legitimate medical usage.
-> >
-> >The DEA request was made in response to an administrative petition filed
-> >July 10, 1995 by Petitioners Jon Gettman and Trans High Corporation,
-> >publisher of High Times Magazine.
-> >
-> >The Petition presents evidence and argument that marijuana and
-> >cannabinoids lack the "high potential for abuse" required for Schedule I
-> >and Schedule II drugs under the (CSA).
-> >
-> >Trans-High Corporation, the publishers of High Times, joined with Mr.
-> >Gettman in mid-1995 to provide support for the petition during the
-> >administrative rule-making process. Petitioners are represented by the
-> >Law Offices of Michael Kennedy, which today released a copy of a letter
-> >from DEA notifying petitioners of the HHS referral.
-> >
-> >Petitioners are represented by the Law Offices of Michael Kennedy in New
-> >York City, which today released a copy of the letter from DEA notifying
-> >Petitioners of the HHS referral.
-> >
-> >Background.
-> >
-> >According to a July 27, 1995, letter from DEA Deputy Administrator Stephen
-> >Greene, accepting the Petition for filing:
-> >
-> >"The DEA shall determine within a reasonable period of time whether there
-> >are sufficient grounds to justify removing marijuana . . . from Schedule I
-> >. . .(S)hould DEA determine that there are sufficient grounds, then it
-> >must request a medical and scientific recommendation from the Secretary of
-> >the Department of Health and Human Services."
-> >
-> >Thus DEA can request the advice of HHS only after DEA's investigation
-> >confirms that sufficient grounds exist to remove marijuana from Schedule
-> >I. According to the CSA the findings and recommendations of HHS with
-> >regard to scientific and medical matters are binding on DEA. DEA has
-> >never before voluntarily referred a marijuana rescheduling petition to HHS
-> >for binding review.
-> >
-> >The Gettman/High times Petition demonstrates that HHS has never produced a
-> >finding that marijuana actually has the high potential for abuse similar
-> >to heroin or cocaine. A high potential for abuse is required for Schedule
-> >I treatment. Further, the legislative history of the CSA indicates that
-> >Congress only intended for marijuana to remain in Schedule I or II if such
-> >a finding could be produced. This Petition challenges the government to
-> >produce such a finding (where none exists) or be legally required to end
-> >marijuana prohibition by removing marijuana from Schedule I.
-> >
-> >Removal of marijuana from Schedule I will require the federal government
-> >to sanction legal distribution of marijuana for medical uses, research and
-> >prescriptions and adopt a regulatory rather than a prohibitory model for
-> >marijuana. The end of prohibition and the advent of regulation will
-> >represent a radical change in the legal status of marijuana in the United
-> >States.
-> >
-> >The Petition argues that the discovery of the Cannabinoid Receptor System,
-> >which has enabled scientists to explain the cause of marijuana's
-> >characteristic effects, and provides a basis for making detailed
-> >distinctions among the biological effects of marijuana and other drugs.
-> >These distinctions provide the scientific basis for demonstrating that
-> >marijuana does not have the same high potential for abuse as other
-> >Schedule I or II drugs.
-> >
-> >DEA reversal of position.
-> >
-> >The DEA to HHS referral represents a historic turn-around for DEA..
-> >
-> >Gettman first asked DEA to refer marijuana to HHS for the appropriate
-> >scientific and medical evaluation back in October of 1994. In March 1995,
-> >in a letter to Gettman's congressman, DEA claimed that "unless a
-> >substance has an accepted medical use in the United States, in can only be
-> >placed in Schedule I." By letter dated April 21, 1995, DEA Administrator
-> >Thomas Constantine stated that DEA was:
-> >
-> >"unaware of any new scientific studies of marijuana that would lead us to
-> >re-evaluate its classification at this time . . . If Mr. Gettman has
-> >access to scientific data concerning marijuana which he wishes to bring to
-> >our attention, we will be pleased to consider it, should he care to share
-> >the documentation with us."
-> >
-> >The Gettman/High Times Petition provided the specific scientific
-> >documentation that caused the DEA to reverse itself and to acknowledge for
-> >the first time ever that a sufficient scientific basis exists for
-> >reclassification of marijuana out of Schedule I
-> >
-> >Petitioners.
-> >
-> >Jon Gettman served as National Director of the National Organization for
-> >the Reform of Marijuana Laws (NORML) from 1986 to 1989, and has provided
-> >articles and columns for High Times since 1985. Gettman is currently
-> >working on his doctorate in public policy and regional economic
-> >development at George Mason University in Fairfax, Virginia.
-> >
-> >Mr. Gettman issued the following statement:
-> >
-> >"People are sent to jail every day because of mistaken assumptions about
-> >the abuse potential of marijuana, assumptions that have never been
-> >scientifically proved. DEA's recognition of this is a welcome and
-> >important step, and in many respects recognition of the importance of the
-> >scientific work of individuals such as Allyn Howlett, William Devane,
-> >Miles Herkenham, Leo Hollister, Denise Kandel, Norman Zinberg, Lester
-> >Grinspoon and other scientists on whose work my petition rests. But this
-> >is also recognition that in many respects marijuana prohibition has been a
-> >cruel hoax on the American people. People think marijuana is in Schedule
-> >I for scientific reasons, and that these reasons legitimize prohibition,
-> >arrests and prison terms. DEA has just acknowledged that there is a lot
-> >of scientific knowledge they haven't considered when they justify
-> >marijuana's Schedule I status. In other words, DEA has presented a
-> >distorted picture of marijuana to government officials and to the public.
-> >I hope our petition will contribute to resolving some of the confusion
-> >created by these distortions."
-> >
-> >High Times Magazine, by its Editor in Chief, Peter Gorman, issued the
-> >following statement:
-> >
-> >"High Times is thrilled that the DEA has acknowledged that there was never
-> >sufficient reason to place cannabis in Schedule I of the CSA, and proud
-> >that the petition originated with Jon Gettman's two part series on
-> >"Marijuana and the Brain" which appeared in our pages in March and July
-> >1995. We hope that journalists from all media who have covered the War on
-> >Drugs will recognize the importance of the DEA's admission regarding the
-> >scheduling of cannabis -- which could potentially result in the end of
-> >prohibition of this benign and medically helpful herb -- and will report
-> >it with the same vigor with which they have reported other DEA findings.
-> >High Times looks forward to the results of the Department of Health and
-> >human Services' investigation of the scientific and medical data regarding
-> >cannabis with great anticipation."
->
<< end of forwarded material >>
--This bud is so stinky you have to keep it in three bags and you can still smell it from across the room, one hit and you are stoned to the bone and crying for mama. ...anonymous
<> tbyars@earthlink.net <>