From: David Honig (honig@sprynet.com)
Date: Mon Mar 06 2000 - 20:44:45 PST
At 10:24 PM 3/6/00 -0600, Missouri FreeNet Administration wrote:
>On Sat, 4 Mar 2000, David Honig wrote:
>:Its not the up/down allocation that's the concern: its
>:the ham-handedness in denying 'servers' in their contract,
>
>This is pretty much an industry standard, whether your
FWIW
I just checked, and Pac Bell's DSL guarantees an up/down
stream rate, with caveats that the system past the headend
isn't under their control. And they don't have problems
with servers ---they'll charge you for a fixed IP, but
Freedom et al. "nodes" don't require even that.
Good news.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Mar 06 2000 - 20:54:20 PST