Re: Hookers.com

Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

From: I'm not a real doofus, but I play one at a national laboratory (baisley@fnal.gov)
Date: Fri Feb 04 2000 - 06:59:27 PST


................................................ "Gambled Bare" wrote:

> You have looked up "geek" in a thesaurus right? It doesn't share the
> entry with "pathetic" for nothing. Just because we have embraced the
> term doesn't change the meaning for the other 99% of the population.
> After consulting a teenage friend [i'll avoid the topic of how times
> have changed], the going rate for sex appears to be 3 beers and free
> transportaion to a bed. But... this rate is for ALPHA males only. As
> best I can figure, there is a sliding scale where the cost increases
> as the divergence from ALPHA increases. The fact that the rate for a
> guy that wants classy companionship is $11,600 doesn't seem all that
> high when you place the type of guy that involves on the that scale.
> I liked the part about how the rich geek has the executive assistant
> call and find the hookers. How long before Egirl is a tab on Amazon?

You know, writing 12 line paragraphs with a straight right-hand margin
won't even move you from nerd to geek, and particularly when there's a
missing or extra antepenultimate word in the antepenultimate sentence.
Becoming an Alpha (fe)male requires obtaining an Alpha of course, see?

.............................................................. Cheers,
................................................................ Wayne

..................................... http://www-oss.fnal.gov/~baisley


Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 04 2000 - 07:03:22 PST