------ =_NextPart_000_01BB998B.114ACFC0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
More RFC humor (I work with business types all day long, so you guys are
the only ones I can share this with):
However, older, superseded, implementations are
known to have treated the serial number as a simple unsigned integer,
with no attempt to implement any kind of "sequence space arithmetic",
however that may have been interpreted, and further, ignoring the
requirement that the value wraps. Nothing can be done with these
implementations, beyond extermination.
>----------
>From: RFC Editor[SMTP:rfc-ed@isi.edu]
>Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 1996 8:34 AM
>To: The recipient's address is unknown.
>Cc: rfc-ed@isi.edu
>Subject: RFC1982 on Serial Number Arithmetic
>
>
>
>A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
>
>
> RFC 1982:
>
> Title: Serial Number Arithmetic
> Author: R. Elz & R. Bush
> Date: August 1996
> Mailbox: kre@munnari.OZ.AU, randy@psg.com
> Pages: 7
> Characters: 14,440
> Updates: 1034, 1035
>
> URL: ftp://ds.internic.net/rfc/rfc1982.txt
>
>
>This memo defines serial number arithmetic, as used in the Domain Name
>System. The DNS has long relied upon serial number arithmetic, a
>concept which has never really been defined, certainly not in an IETF
>document, though which has been widely understood. This memo supplies
>the missing definition. It is intended to update RFC 1034 and RFC
>1035. This RFC is the product of the DNS IXFR, Notification, and
>Dynamic Update Working Group of the IETF.
>
>This is now a Proposed Standard Protocol.
>
>This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the
>Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for
>improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet
>Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state and
>status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
>
>This announcement is sent to the IETF list and the RFC-DIST list.
>Requests to be added to or deleted from the IETF distribution list
>should be sent to IETF-REQUEST@CNRI.RESTON.VA.US. Requests to be
>added to or deleted from the RFC-DIST distribution list should
>be sent to RFC-DIST-REQUEST@ISI.EDU.
>
>Details on obtaining RFCs via FTP or EMAIL may be obtained by sending
>an EMAIL message to rfc-info@ISI.EDU with the message body
>help: ways_to_get_rfcs. For example:
>
> To: rfc-info@ISI.EDU
> Subject: getting rfcs
>
> help: ways_to_get_rfcs
>
>Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
>author of the RFC in question, or to admin@DS.INTERNIC.NET. Unless
>specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
>unlimited distribution.
>
>Submissions for Requests for Comments should be sent to
>RFC-EDITOR@ISI.EDU. Please consult RFC 1543, Instructions to RFC
>Authors, for further information.
>
>
>Joyce K. Reynolds and Mary Kennedy
>USC/Information Sciences Institute
>
>...
>
>Below is the data which will enable a MIME compliant Mail Reader
>implementation to automatically retrieve the ASCII version
>of the RFCs.
>
>
------ =_NextPart_000_01BB998B.114ACFC0
Content-Type: Message/External-body; name="ATT00315.txt"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Q29udGVudC10eXBlOiBtZXNzYWdlL2V4dGVybmFsLWJvZHk7DQoJYWNjZXNzLXR5cGU9Im1haWwt
c2VydmVyIjsNCglzZXJ2ZXI9Im1haWxzZXJ2QGRzLmludGVybmljLm5ldCINCg0KQ29udGVudC1U
eXBlOiB0ZXh0L3BsYWluDQpDb250ZW50LUlEOiA8OTYwOTAzMDgzMTAxLlJGQ0BJU0kuRURVPg0K
DQpTRU5EIC9yZmMvcmZjMTk4Mi50eHQNCg0K
------ =_NextPart_000_01BB998B.114ACFC0
Content-Type: Message/External-body; name="rfc1982.txt.url"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
W0ludGVybmV0U2hvcnRjdXRdDQpVUkw9ZnRwOi8vZHMuaW50ZXJuaWMubmV0L3JmYy9yZmMxOTgy
LnR4dA0K
------ =_NextPart_000_01BB998B.114ACFC0--