Any reason you picked 37 to make your point?
See http://www.xent.com/april00/0741.html
James
----- Original Message -----
From: "Joseph S. Barrera III" <joe@barrera.org>
To: "Rohit Khare" <Rohit@knownow.com>
Cc: <FoRK@xent.com>
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 7:00 PM
Subject: Re: Welcome to 'tool' confusion
> Also sprach Rohit Khare:
> > It would be interesting to imagine what happens when chips get fast
> > enough that *RAM* is "a few weeks away by stagecoach".
>
> Of course at that point, they'll have 37 levels of cache.
>
> - Der Fuhrer
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun May 06 2001 - 08:04:36 PDT