>clear how the findings apply to the general population, but a RAND
>Corporation senior scientist says, "They did an extremely careful
>scientific study, and it's not a result that's easily ignored." (New York
>Times 30 Aug 98)
CMU is also the place where the Rimm "Porn is Everywhere" study was done and
was the basis of Time's Net Porn coverage. Also, I haven't seen it myself,
but the little blurbs do nothing to assure the reader they are not fallying
prey to a common causal fallacy. (The Net may not cause loneliness, rather
people that are already lonely may turn to the Net.) Haven't seen the full
report myself though...
_______________________
Regards, http://web.mit.edu/reagle/www/home.html
Joseph Reagle E0 D5 B2 05 B6 12 DA 65 BE 4D E3 C1 6A 66 25 4E
independent research account