Re: Uncle Dave ponders the meaning of namespaces

Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

From: Tom Whore (tomwhore@inetarena.com)
Date: Fri Aug 11 2000 - 08:58:59 PDT

On Fri, 11 Aug 2000, Dave Winer wrote:

--]Dan thanks for the thoughtful response, but this is a slippery slope.
--]
--]I fear it's hopeless. XML, as promoted by the W3C, is not for people who
--]love the Web. We continue to have this argument. It's a total waste of time.

Im not sure what you meanwhen you say XML is not for people who "Love" the
web. I love the web. Im begining to really dig XML? AM I now a Non Lover
of the web? Will the web not send me flowers anymore????

WEll thats it then. I spent the best years of the last decade in love with
the web and now it comes down to this. Im gettng a lawyer and I suggest
the web does the same.

The car and house are mine, im not budging on that point. The WEb can have
the photo albums of the wedding and the kids on alternative weekends...but
only when supervised by Steve Case....I mean we all know how the web can
be sometimes .

"the flowerrrrrrrrrrrrs of
ro manaaaance" JL

    [---===tomwhore@ []wsmf.org []inetarena.com []slack.net===---]
                   WSMF's web site ----http://wsmf.org

Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Aug 11 2000 - 09:00:30 PDT