Re: [Winer] Sun & SOAP: Yes or no?

From: Manoj Kasichainula (manojk@io.com)
Date: Thu May 18 2000 - 14:01:04 PDT

• Next message: Kragen Sitaker: "webtechs is back"
• Previous message: Ian Andrew Bell: "Re: Boo.com"
• In reply to: Jim Whitehead: "RE: [Winer] Sun & SOAP: Yes or no?"
• Next in thread: Gavin Thomas Nicol: "RE: [Winer] Sun & SOAP: Yes or no?"

On Thu, May 18, 2000 at 10:24:12AM -0700, Jim Whitehead wrote:
> It not like Sun will immediately drop RMI (also an RPC) if they start
> adopting SOAP, so removing a competitor isn't a good reason.

My understanding from RMI back in the day was that any
object-transmission protocol could be stuck underneath. I don't know
details, but I imagine SOAP could be put underneath RMI as well.

• Next message: Kragen Sitaker: "webtechs is back"
• Previous message: Ian Andrew Bell: "Re: Boo.com"
• In reply to: Jim Whitehead: "RE: [Winer] Sun & SOAP: Yes or no?"
• Next in thread: Gavin Thomas Nicol: "RE: [Winer] Sun & SOAP: Yes or no?"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu May 18 2000 - 14:05:01 PDT