Re: Someone please tell me why Snapfish.com is worth $40 million in funding?

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: B.K. DeLong (bkdelong@pobox.com)
Date: Wed May 03 2000 - 19:06:45 PDT

Next message: Adam Rifkin -4K: "Re: [MSNBC] Press releases + dot.com = 74,000% return in one year."
Previous message: Carey Lening: "Re: Someone please tell me why Snapfish.com is worth $40 million in funding?"
In reply to: Adam Rifkin -4K: "Someone please tell me why Snapfish.com is worth $40 million in funding?"
Next in thread: Mike Masnick: "RE: Someone please tell me why Snapfish.com is worth $40 million in funding?"

At 01:11 PM 05/03/2000 -0700, Adam Rifkin -4K wrote:
>What kind of brand name is Snapfish anyway?

One of the only domains available that sounded remotely cool? It seems most
.com startups these days base their name on whatever domain they can get
without shelling out millions. It doesn't seem to matter that it has
nothing to do with the product.

-- B.K. DeLong Research Lead ZOT Group

617.642.7149 bkdelong@zotgroup.com http://www.zotgroup.com

Next message: Adam Rifkin -4K: "Re: [MSNBC] Press releases + dot.com = 74,000% return in one year."
Previous message: Carey Lening: "Re: Someone please tell me why Snapfish.com is worth $40 million in funding?"
In reply to: Adam Rifkin -4K: "Someone please tell me why Snapfish.com is worth $40 million in funding?"
Next in thread: Mike Masnick: "RE: Someone please tell me why Snapfish.com is worth $40 million in funding?"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed May 03 2000 - 19:02:12 PDT