RE: O2K XML

Gavin Thomas Nicol (gtn@eps.inso.com)
Wed, 7 Apr 1999 12:38:43 -0400

> >http://webreview.com/wr/pub/1999/04/02/edge/index.html?wwwrrr
> _19990402.txt
> >
> >It doesn't look pretty -- I'm hoping the article just screwed up in
> >transcribing the XML.
>

I used O2K, and in fact, I think the XML is worse than the snippets
shown... a lot is hidden in comments, and bound up in psuedo marked
sections. Some of it isn't even well-formed in the stuff my version
of powerpoint generates.