Jeff Bone wrote:
>
> Joseph S Barrera III wrote:
>
> > AOh, come on. This model is SO old and there's SO much prior art that
> > no unexpired patent could possibly hold up. Might as well patent
> > prostitution as a business model.
>
> Genius! Pure genius! Joe, call your IP guy, wake 'em up!!! A fancy title on
> the app and the idiots over at the PTO will never know, they obviously never
> actually look at the things. Let's see, what class does that fit into? Perhaps
> any of the following:
> 186 MERCHANDISING
> 199 TYPE CASTING (I'm thinkin' roleplaying, here... ;-)
.
.
.
> 968 HOROLOGY
>
> G'nite!
>
> :-)
>
> jb
>
> cf. http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/ac/ido/oeip/taf/def/
042 REALITY
ha ha ha
Reality is cool... cool as the drive for survival.
MaggieB, having no beef with prostitutes, gender regardless
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Apr 29 2001 - 20:25:27 PDT