Re: Grading the gov't (was Re: G & J, in cahoots?)

From: Grlygrl201@aol.com
Date: Tue Mar 20 2001 - 18:27:32 PST

Next message: Tom WSMF: "Re: Grading the gov't (was Re: G & J, in cahoots?)"
Previous message: Grlygrl201@aol.com: "Re: Grading the gov't (was Re: G & J, in cahoots?)"
Maybe in reply to: Jeff Bone: "Grading the gov't (was Re: G & J, in cahoots?)"
Next in thread: Matt Jensen: "Tornados, etc. (Re: Grading the gov't (was Re: G & J, in cahoots?))"
Reply: Matt Jensen: "Tornados, etc. (Re: Grading the gov't (was Re: G & J, in cahoots?))"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

In a message dated 3/20/01 7:51:53 PM Eastern Standard Time, jbone@jump.net
writes:

<< BTW, Austin's not really considered to be in Tornado Alley. >>

i can wish, can't i?

Next message: Tom WSMF: "Re: Grading the gov't (was Re: G & J, in cahoots?)"
Previous message: Grlygrl201@aol.com: "Re: Grading the gov't (was Re: G & J, in cahoots?)"
Maybe in reply to: Jeff Bone: "Grading the gov't (was Re: G & J, in cahoots?)"
Next in thread: Matt Jensen: "Tornados, etc. (Re: Grading the gov't (was Re: G & J, in cahoots?))"
Reply: Matt Jensen: "Tornados, etc. (Re: Grading the gov't (was Re: G & J, in cahoots?))"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Apr 27 2001 - 23:14:37 PDT