Re: Grading the gov't (was Re: G & J, in cahoots?)

From: Jeff Bone (jbone@jump.net)
Date: Tue Mar 20 2001 - 16:27:16 PST

Next message: Jeff Bone: "Re: G & J, in cahoots?"
Previous message: Robert Harley: "Re: Rambus uppcomeance"
In reply to: Jeff Barr: "RE: Grading the gov't (was Re: G & J, in cahoots?)"
Next in thread: Grlygrl201@aol.com: "Re: Grading the gov't (was Re: G & J, in cahoots?)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Jeff Barr wrote:

> You missed two really obvious targets:
>
> FAA: Air safety gets better all the time, B+
> IRS: <insufficient data>

FAA: agreed
IRS: almost entirely unnecessary if we go to a flat consumption tax

Next message: Jeff Bone: "Re: G & J, in cahoots?"
Previous message: Robert Harley: "Re: Rambus uppcomeance"
In reply to: Jeff Barr: "RE: Grading the gov't (was Re: G & J, in cahoots?)"
Next in thread: Grlygrl201@aol.com: "Re: Grading the gov't (was Re: G & J, in cahoots?)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Apr 27 2001 - 23:14:35 PDT