On Wed, Mar 14, 2001 at 10:33:34AM -0800, Gordon Mohr wrote:
> If saving bandwidth on basic HTML pages was such a
> big win, I'd expect high-volume website to have already
> applied simple compression techniques on all the pages
> they serve. (They haven't, have they?)
netscape has supported transparent gzipping since..um, a long time ago.
and I've seen sites use it.
and take a look at the html google generates...while not _compressed_ it's certainly designed to be as tight as possible. (no CRs no extraneous space, etc...)
> - Gordon
-- jesse reed vincent -- root@eruditorum.org -- jesse@fsck.com 70EBAC90: 2A07 FC22 7DB4 42C1 9D71 0108 41A3 3FB3 70EB AC90T\'waS br|ll1G 4|\||> 7#e sl1T#Y T0v3s D1|> gYR3 4nd Gimb@1 1|\| 7#E \/\/A83 all |\/|1|\/|53Y W3R3 d4 60r0GR0V3s @|\||> |>4 M0MES wr47H oUTGR4b3.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Apr 27 2001 - 23:14:12 PDT