You'd think, but for 1) I don't think I can get the distance, and
2) there really is a lot of noise between here and there.
At the very outset, if I can bridge the distance, I am assuming
it'll be somewhere between 1Mbs and nothing depending on the
actual card.
I am hoping to figure out some HiperLAN2 type approach which would
seem like a waste. 54Mbs of glorious 5Ghz channel with absolutely
nobody populating that spectrum; I am hoping I can do it without
bending a couple of FCC rules in the process. I don't want to light up all
the toasters between here and there with FoRK traffic. 8-)
It sucks to know something is so close, but so far.
Greg
Jesse wrote:
>
> Sounds like you could get away with a point-to-point 802.11b link
> and a couple of unidirectional pole-mount antennas.
>
> -j
>
> On Sat, Mar 10, 2001 at 11:06:16AM -0800, Gregory Alan Bolcer wrote:
> > Very likely a free line of site, hard to tell from the hill
> > but hard to tell from all the trees, etc. I can mount something
> > very high up and they are at a very strategic point on the
> > hill. My budge is that it can't be more than $100 per month,
> > but up front costs can run up to a couple of thousand. If
> > TAD stock ever recovers I am just buying a T1, but until
> > then I have to be judicious with my spending habits.
> >
> > Any ideas?
> >
> > Greg
> --
> jesse reed vincent -- root@eruditorum.org -- jesse@fsck.com
> 70EBAC90: 2A07 FC22 7DB4 42C1 9D71 0108 41A3 3FB3 70EB AC90
>
> . . . when not in doubt, get in doubt. -- Old Discordian Proveb
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Apr 27 2001 - 23:14:02 PDT