Re: [XML Bastard] XML Sucks! Fork You! No! Fork Yourself!

From: Tony Finch (dot@dotat.at)
Date: Tue Mar 06 2001 - 14:41:30 PST

Next message: Jeff Bone: "Re: Big Uncle (was P2P's essense - was FoRK This Action!! (P2P's Dark Side))"
Previous message: Gary Pupurs: "Re: FoRK This Action!! (P2P's Dark Side)"
In reply to: Stephen D. Williams: "Re: [XML Bastard] XML Sucks! Fork You! No! Fork Yourself!"
Next in thread: Stephen D. Williams: "Re: [XML Bastard] XML Sucks! Fork You! No! Fork Yourself!"
Reply: Stephen D. Williams: "Re: [XML Bastard] XML Sucks! Fork You! No! Fork Yourself!"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

"Stephen D. Williams" <sdw@lig.net> wrote:
>
>Suggest something. Something like IETF headers? With the new CMIP
>rules (mainly to avoid the silly restrictions on line length and
>annoying continuance stuff) it's ok for flat things.

CMIP rules? URL?

Tony.

-- 
f.a.n.finch      fanf@covalent.net      dot@dotat.at
SOUTH BISCAY: SOUTH 3 OR 4. SHOWERS. MAINLY GOOD.

Next message: Jeff Bone: "Re: Big Uncle (was P2P's essense - was FoRK This Action!! (P2P's Dark Side))"
Previous message: Gary Pupurs: "Re: FoRK This Action!! (P2P's Dark Side)"
In reply to: Stephen D. Williams: "Re: [XML Bastard] XML Sucks! Fork You! No! Fork Yourself!"
Next in thread: Stephen D. Williams: "Re: [XML Bastard] XML Sucks! Fork You! No! Fork Yourself!"
Reply: Stephen D. Williams: "Re: [XML Bastard] XML Sucks! Fork You! No! Fork Yourself!"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Apr 27 2001 - 23:13:31 PDT