On Sun, 4 Mar 2001, Adam L. Beberg wrote:
> Hint: enough people demand (and pay for) static IP's that we run out,
> forcing the IPv6 issue, then we have enough addresses, and having a static
> IP just becomes normal, forcing costs down, then client+server just becomes
You don't need a static IP to serve content. In fact occasionally changing
IPs plus crypto will make traffic capture and analysis somewhat more
difficult.
> the universal norm again. Opps, did I mention paying, well that plan will
> never work will it, odds are we'll just build more layers of NAT until the
> internet is completely useless.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Apr 27 2001 - 23:13:28 PDT