In a message dated 2/19/2001 3:04:03 AM, ThosStew@aol.com writes:
Return-Path: <fork-owner@kragen.dnaco.net>
Received: from rly-xc03.mx.aol.com (rly-xc03.mail.aol.com [172.20.105.136])
by air-xc01.mail.aol.com (v77_r1.21) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Feb 2001 03:04:02
-0500
Received: from XeNT.ics.uci.edu (xent.ics.uci.edu [128.195.21.213]) by
rly-xc03.mx.aol.com (v77_r1.21) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Feb 2001 03:03:46 -0500
Received: from kragen.dnaco.net (kragen.dnaco.net [207.238.206.70])
by XeNT.ics.uci.edu (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id XAA09590
for <FoRK@xent.ics.uci.edu>; Sun, 18 Feb 2001 23:58:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 9750 invoked by alias); 27 Jan 2001 16:59:05 -0000
Delivered-To: fork@kragen.dnaco.net
Received: (qmail 9746 invoked from network); 27 Jan 2001 16:59:03 -0000
Received: from imo-r11.mx.aol.com (152.163.225.65)
by kragen.dnaco.net with SMTP; 27 Jan 2001 16:59:03 -0000
Received: from ThosStew@aol.com
by imo-r11.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v29.5.) id i.84.109ce4e7 (3954);
Sat, 27 Jan 2001 11:58:20 -0500 (EST)
From: ThosStew@aol.com
Message-ID: <84.109ce4e7.27a4582b@aol.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2001 11:58:19 EST
Subject: Re: why ascii might not be enough :-)
my goodness: That (and the one about business cycles) showed up on FoRK 24
days after I sent it. Has the USPS taken over the list?
T
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Apr 27 2001 - 23:17:54 PDT