Oh, please, don't let's beat this spavined nag all the time. Quoting Dan on
the subject of media bias is like quoting Janet Reno on the subject of
prosecutorial partiality. He's a great guy and very smart, when he was at
Fortune, was a valued colleague, but Dan's about 300% more biased than the
New York Times—that's one reason he's a columnist—and one of his biases is
antipathy toward the Times. You cold probably do a Nexis search on Dan's
stuff and fail to find any column by him in which he acknowledged that the
Times might have been fair and right on anything whatsoever.
Tom
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Apr 27 2001 - 23:19:11 PDT