[FoRK] AngularJS — Superheroic JavaScript MVW Framework

Stephen Williams sdw at lig.net
Wed Oct 9 20:07:48 PDT 2013


http://www.infoworld.com/d/application-development/the-10-hottest-javascript-framework-projects-228335

On 10/9/13 7:09 PM, Stephen Williams wrote:
> Server side, I'm most interested in Node.js + js/node-java and/or 
> nginx + C++.  Java server code is OK, and should be an option, but 
> I'll probably end up at C++ for anything very serious.
>
> On 10/9/13 4:44 PM, Gregory Alan Bolcer wrote:
>> Vaadin.
>
> I will look into it!  GWT was always a cool idea, but too limited UI 
> wise in practice.  I'm still unclear with these Java->Javascript 
> methods whether offline mode etc. can be done.  I will probably limit 
> myself to methods that can produce a ChromeOS off-line app. Can Vaadin 
> do that?  Sort of maybe:
> https://vaadin.com/blog/-/blogs/offline-mode-in-vaadin-apps-absurd-joke-or-a-real-solution 
>
>
> There are a number of other interesting server-side Java frameworks 
> that could work with various front-ends.
> Really, there is a lot to be said for keeping servers as RESTy, 
> transactional services that know nothing about UI.  You can always 
> have a separate web app that provides a low/no Javascript front end 
> for those services if necessary.
>
> In my case, I need total flexibility to create radically original UI 
> mechanisms.  It is not always obvious which will give the most power 
> and the most flexibility while also being efficient, clean, and fun.
>
>>
>> On 10/9/2013 12:00 PM, Lucas Gonze wrote:
>>> I see Angular and peers as basically the current generation of web
>>> architecture. Rails+Backbone was best of breed in the last gen, PHP the
>>> winner in the generation before that.
>
> PHP was OK.  Facebook has apparently solved most of the performance 
> issues of it.  But it is hard to get excited about PHP for everything.
> Got a close look at a well-built Rails project, but I just can't get 
> excited about it.  Language isn't more interesting than Javascript and 
> apparently can't really be efficient or scale like better choices.
>
>>>
>>> My own choice among this group is MeteorJS. It has two advantages over
>>> peers. One, integrated stack between client and server, so that you're
>
> I have that bookmarked somewhere but had forgotten.  Thanks!
>
>>> using the same infrastructure. Previous generation required 
>>> different dev
>>> stack for client and server, typically (Rails or Node)+jQuery+Backbone.
>>> Two, copious funding, which ensures longevity.
>>> http://venturebeat.com/2012/07/25/meteor-funding/
>>>
>>> My team has been doing this for about 9 months, and I'm very happy 
>>> with the
>>> choice so far.
>>>
>
> sdw
>
> _______________________________________________
> FoRK mailing list
> http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork



More information about the FoRK mailing list