[FoRK] AngularJS — Superheroic JavaScript MVW Framework

Lucas Gonze lucas.gonze at gmail.com
Wed Oct 9 13:40:52 PDT 2013

To be clear, the fact that Meteor has a back end component is a huge
advantage, and a large part of the reason why I went with Meteor instead of
Angular or Ember.

In our work this has been a win. There's much less complexity, fewer pieces
to maintain, less to learn.

On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 12:14 PM, <rst at ai.mit.edu> wrote:

> Lucas Gonze writes:
>  > I see Angular and peers as basically the current generation of web
>  > architecture. Rails+Backbone was best of breed in the last gen, PHP the
>  > winner in the generation before that.
> The thing is, of the stacks you mentioned, only Meteor has a back-end
> component; Angular and Ember are client-side code only.  You still
> need *something* at the back end, and while full Rails isn't
> necessarily the best choice, Rails components (ActiveRecord in
> particular) are still a reasonable choice for that part of the stack.
> rst
> _______________________________________________
> FoRK mailing list
> http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork

More information about the FoRK mailing list