J. Andrew Rogers
andrew at jarbox.org
Mon Oct 7 19:41:14 PDT 2013
I do not know anything about angular.js, and do zero web development of any kind, but it has been the topic of recent discussion among friends whose opinions on such matters I trust. Consensus seems to be that it is deeply flawed in some regards or at least for some use cases. I couldn't really tell you why though, which makes this opinion approximately worthless hearsay. But hey, crappy anecdotes might be better than no anecdotes. :-)
On Oct 7, 2013, at 1:25 PM, Dr. Ernest Prabhakar <drernie at radicalcentrism.org> wrote:
> I've been hearing more about this lately, and it sounds impressive:
>> HTML is great for declaring static documents, but it falters when we try to use it for declaring dynamic views in web-applications. AngularJS lets you extend HTML vocabulary for your application. The resulting environment is extraordinarily expressive, readable, and quick to develop.
>> AngularJS is a toolset for building the framework most suited to your application development. It is fully extensible and works well with other libraries. Every feature can be modified or replaced to suit your unique development workflow and feature needs. Read on to find out how.
> Any opinions?
> Has this already been discussed here, and I'm just late to the party?
> -- Ernie P.
> P.S. See also:
> FoRK mailing list
More information about the FoRK