[FoRK] Hey, big spender...
jbone at place.org
Tue Jun 10 10:15:14 PDT 2008
On Jun 10, 2008, at 11:57 AM, Lucas Gonze wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 9:02 AM, Jeff Bone <jbone at place.org> wrote:
>> Take off the rose-colored glasses you got at the last United
>> Worker's Party meeting and come back to reality, they're whoppers.
>> Some of
>> 'em are, anyway, and the ones that aren't are just the usual left-
>> wing "help
>> the people" agenda items. But IMHO *any* new spending at this time
>> is a
> If you're calling the usual items whoppers, and you admit that they're
> the usual, your use of "whopper" just doesn't mean anything.
Not true; the total cost of the new spending proposals Obama's
offered up on the campaign trail, collectively, total something in the
neighborhood of $1T (rough est., but certainly in the ballpark.)
That's not insubstantial. One might reasonably say --- whopper.
Furthermore, as I said, we already have and have for some time had a
whopper of a spending problem. You don't fix that with MORE spending.
> On top
> of that, saying that all spending is k-r-aaaaaaaa-zy is radical talk
> which isn't going to find a lot of takers.
The spending we've seen has been crazy spending. Talk of spending
EVEN MORE on top of that is (even) crazy (-ier) talk.
> There's nothing specific to Obama in what you're complaining about.
Except the $1T in new spending he's proposing... Except the fact that
he hasn't said anything concrete about spending REDUCTION.
More information about the FoRK