[FoRK] Obama disingenuousness
Jeff Bone
<jbone at place.org> on
Wed Apr 23 18:43:24 PDT 2008
BTW, there's one more thing that's been troubling me about Obama's
misuse of Warren Buffet's statement about secretaries paying
"more" (rate wise, though obviously not in total) than their investor-
bosses in the context of the the Loathsome Hedge Fund 50. While I
have no doubt that Warren Buffet pays a lower overall blended tax rate
than his secretary --- his wealth and income is most likely largely in
the form of long-term capital gains, he's a long-term investor ---
it's HIGHLY unlikely that more than a small part of the $29B those
hedge fund managers made last year was taxed at the long-term cap
gains rate. Generally speaking most hedge funds aren't primarily long-
term investors AFAIK. The bulk of that take was almost certainly
taxed at a higher rate; a part of it in the form of regular income
taxed almost exclusively at the top rate and a larger part of it taxed
at the highest short-term cap gains rate. Net-net I'd wager a fair
penny that the blended tax rate paid on that "ill-gotten" $29B was
considerably higher than the rate the supposed $60k / year secretary
pays.
And I suspect Obama is and was quite aware of that, but "screw the
rich" both resonates better with his own socialist attitude and plays
better in economically-stressed Peoria.
$0.02,
jb
More information about the FoRK
mailing list