Confession Re: [FoRK] "Peace and Love"
Jeff Bone
<jbone at place.org> on
Thu Dec 20 21:33:42 PST 2007
On Dec 20, 2007, at 8:44 PM, Sat N wrote:
> Here is a word of the day for you:
>
> Intellectualization [1]
>
> [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intellectualization
Just to carve things up into little Sat-sized pieces:
My objection to Dr. Ernie's equating my attempt at reasoning from
observation with his *beliefs* is "epistemological" in nature ---
they are fundamentally different processes, regardless of how
desperately he, you, or any other "apologist" for faith might wish
those processes weren't different.
The ontological problem is a problems are many, but among others the
issue I'm objecting to is the assumption that his *conclusions* have
the same basis in reality as mine, *given* different assumptions.
I.e., he can happily skip past anyone's utilitarian reasoning around
existential risks since he doesn't have to admit that rational,
statistical extrapolation from observation has a different status
from foregone conclusions extrapolated from faith.
Now, I realize I've thrown a bunch of jargon at you here, but just to
review:
- epistemology is about how we know what we know; it's the heart
of the argument against faith
- ontology is about the metaphysical status, i.e. (non-)existence
or reality of, the subject of consideration
- existential risk: you "faith" fuckers are going to blow up the
fucking planet, get it?
- ...and you whistle past the graveyard because your learning
mechanism is fucked, see?
...and that irritates me just a little bit.
Okay, that's your lesson for today. Now go back to playing Robin to
Dr. Ernie's Caped Crusader. It's awfully cute.
jb
More information about the FoRK
mailing list