[FoRK] His Not-So-Dark Materials
Jeff Bone
<jbone at place.org> on
Fri Nov 30 19:03:22 PST 2007
On Nov 30, 2007, at 8:14 PM, Lion Kimbro wrote:
> On Nov 30, 2007 5:49 PM, Jeff Bone <jbone at place.org> wrote:
>> On Nov 30, 2007, at 7:23 PM, Lion Kimbro wrote:
>>>> Why? Why isn't it just wonderful enough --- in itself?
>> What exactly do you mean by *mystical?* Therein, I suspect, lies the
>> rub; I say it's in no way mystical, merely physical --- and very
>> complex.
>
> Yeah, but, ...
>
> It's **mystically** complex.
And here we go again.
You're using words like "mystical" and "religion" and so forth in an
absolutely ridiculous, metaphorical sense --- in a very truly ironic
way (though I suspect that you don't intend irony.)
The problem with this is, it's hogwash. It *confuses* some very
unobjectionable things -- wonder at life, appreciation of complexity,
etc. -- with some very vague, troublesome, and even *dangerous*
things that have long plagued human attempts to understand the
world. You claim this is in some way *useful.* I disagree --- it's
vague, imprecise, confused, counterproductive at best, and even
dangerous if the purpose is achieving a consensus understanding of
the world we live in.
$0.02, that's really all I've got to say about the topic. I've got
my plate full arguing against actual religion, much less your silly
attempt to define the problem away and rhetorically sweep all the
trouble under the rug.
jb
More information about the FoRK
mailing list