[FoRK] The Answer is 42 - 6 multiplied by 9

James Tauber jtauber at jtauber.com
Wed Nov 17 05:05:56 PST 2004

On 17/11/04 5:11 PM, "Eugen Leitl" <eugen at leitl.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2004 at 08:44:12AM +0800, James Tauber wrote:
>> What if Democritus got it the wrong way around and it's the atoms that are
>> epiphenomenal? In other words, physics is a side-effect of the
> Physics has gone a long way since Democritus.

I was specifically referring to the Democritian view (still held, no?) that
sense is epiphenomenal and elementary particles are foundational.

My strawman hypothesis a brains-in-jars simulation as opposed to an
elementary particle simulation.

>> implementation details of a simulation at a much higher level, not the
>> foundation of the simulation.
> So the self-consistent body of physical theories and measurements are fake,
> or just a potyemkin village?

Yes (see my previous reference to the connection with "apparent age"
creationism), although not necessarily deliberately so .

My strawman hypothesis is that the rules of physics are the way the
simulated consciousnesses interpret the simulation. They are not what is
directly being simulated.


More information about the FoRK mailing list