[FoRK] The Answer is 42 - 6 multiplied by 9

Bill Humphries bill at whump.com
Mon Nov 15 18:33:35 PST 2004

On Nov 15, 2004, at 6:25 PM, Ian Andrew Bell (FoRK) wrote:

> On 15-Nov-04, at 1:42 PM, James Tauber wrote:
>> How do simulation hypothesizers feel about the possibility that the
>> programmer(s) of the simulation might have made tweaks at various 
>> points in
>> its history and in some cases, intervened quite dramatically in the 
>> running
>> of the simulation.
> Now >THAT< is the most plausible explanation I've heard yet for all 
> those inflated voting numbers coming from the Diebold electronic 
> voting machines.


God uses cheat codes, pass it on.

-- whump

More information about the FoRK mailing list