[FoRK] Geo-surfing (was Web 2.0)
Stephen D. Williams
sdw at lig.net
Tue Oct 12 11:07:48 PDT 2004
The ability to share through email or Internet geo-URLs with referenced
image or data overlays is really great.
You need the commercial license to be able to share databases.
The very high resolution areas are obtained not from satellite data but
from aerial flyover. You can see the seaming in places like Tokyo from
wide angle lense perspective of buildings. Still great, and in some
places like Las Vegas can give effective resolutions of 4" per pixel or
better. Earthviewer shows you the one or more data sets involved in
each view as you move around, which is cool.
The price on the pro version has dropped quite a bit, from $1100-1200
down to $600, but there are several gotta-have add on modules for $300 each.
They only have average and/or typical peak traffic information
available, right? Realtime information would be very cool, like Tokyo has.
Nasa WorldWind seems very very similar. Earthviewer/Keyhole in fact do
use the Big Blue Marble data, but the engines seem to have identical
goals. A history of which came first and the relationship would be
J.Andrew Rogers wrote:
> On Oct 11, 2004, at 4:02 PM, Stephen D. Williams wrote:
>> Terraserver is ok, but Keyhole / Earthviewer is really cool.
>> I've been playing with it off and on for years, since before Sept.
>> 2002 in fact.
> I'll second that, and we've also been using it since its early days.
> Keyhole is a completely different class of capability than
> Terraserver, and the resolution of some of the data in their system
> can put Terraserver to shame. The new version of their software
> allows you to integrate live data layers into the system (which
> supports over 100 different simultaneous data layers IIRC), which is
> Hollywood sci-fi slick.
> Imagine seeing a realtime 2.5D geographic view of just about any type
> of data you wish, such as realtime vehicle traffic data, weather
> precipitation data, RF propagation data, Starbucks latte sales data,
> and who knows what else, all simultaneously. Throw on a few dozen
> static data layers for fun e.g. skunk population density and
> distribution (data which actually exists BTW). All realtime, mapped
> over a very high-resolution zoomable geography of the region of your
> Very, very sexy eye candy, and with nearly endless practical uses.
> After the fun of geo-surfing the data wears off, of course.
> j. andrew rogers
> FoRK mailing list
More information about the FoRK