Transhumanity, like it or not? (was: Prince Charles gets
jbone at deepfile.com
Mon Apr 28 17:40:43 PDT 2003
On Monday, Apr 28, 2003, at 16:01 US/Central, Tom wrote:
> As for a "greater mind" knowing whats best for me, I dont buy into that
> from the Judeo/Christians, Islamics, etc etc so why should I buy into
> or some other "higher power" scheme no matter who techofashionately
Generally speaking, I agree with the sentiment but not the particulars.
Please don't forget what I said: I don't find forced-change an
acceptable outcome. But I also don't find extinction an acceptable
outcome. Finding a balance between the two that preserves autonomy is
my preferred path.
You're too anxious to tar everything with your ubiquitous "faith"
brush, Tom, particularly in this case. Doing so causes serious
ontological breakage in the conversation. I'm not taking it for
granted that transhumans will be benevolent or will necessarily know or
keep mere humans' best interests in mind. OTOH, I'm not knee-jerk
enough to automatically assume they won't. Making either call is a
leap of faith, and I'm won't go there.
> Once again, offering up humanity to those sort of "faith based" choices
> seems as precarious as most other faith based choices.
Again, not a faith-based choice. Merely a possibility, one that relies
on faith not at all. Faith is that which by definition is beyond
rational discourse. We can't really rationally discuss differing
points of view on whether or not "God" exists. (We can rationally have
a meta- or second-order discussion about that, though.) We can have a
very rational (albeit long and winding) discussion about transhuman
ethics, and we might even get *some* small part of that right, based on
being pre-transhumans or proto-transhumans ourselves.
> In so much as the Transhumans will still be in some part human and
> the historical behavioral dealings of humans in social settings it
> seems a
> better bet to go with the "Meet the new boss, same as the old boss"
This ignores the qualitative differences that will likely be in effect.
Seems rather pessimistic to assume that, with better thinking
facilities to draw on, that'll just lead to bigger / tougher / more
More information about the FoRK