Sat, 26 Jan 2002 10:16:41 -0800
No, if you want a real conspiracy you say "Maybe someone didn't want him to
talk and arranged the suicide ...".
From: Adam L. Beberg [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2002 12:21 AM
To: John Hall
Subject: RE: Enron solution
On Fri, 25 Jan 2002, John Hall wrote:
> To Adam: He wasn't an ex-head. He was an ex-high up. Further, I thought
> was about the only one that resigned early (like last March) in protest.
> least I thought the 'whistle blower' letter mentioned him.
Oh please, facts have no place in the legal system. He Darwin'd and
volunteered to be scapegoat, end of story.
> But if you want a conspiracy, then why was *this* person the one who blew
> his head off? (See note to Adam). It seems a bit curious.
He wouldn't unless he knew he was gonna be in deep trouble now would he?
- Adam L. "Duncan" Beberg