Thu, 10 Jan 2002 18:39:13 -0400
> Well then, for Bin Laden to be a revolutionary, he would have to fight in
> those Middle East countries against the established governments.. To
> attack the U.S. is terrorism because he is attempting to alter U.S. policy
> by attacking its citizens, not its army.
In his mind they are puppet governments set up by the United States. Saudi Arabia,
Iraq, Iran, Jordan, Egypt are all US colonies, so that an attack on them would
cause little harm to the faraway rulers in Washington.
This is quite a common perception outside the United States. You know, that the
US props up corrupt dictators and promotes the denial of basic human rights
> the engagement of the military of that government. Note that this implies
> the acts of violence are not intended to overthrow the established government.
So are the IRA terrorists or freedom fighters?