S. Alexander Jacobson
Thu, 10 Jan 2002 12:27:37 -0500 (Eastern Standard Time)
The freedom fighter acts to gain the support of
the people (deligitimate the regime). The
terrorists acts to make the people fear future
actions and cause their government to do things
that appease the terrorists (prevent future
As I said before, terrorism only makes sense
Marty's point about foreign soil is that
terrorists view the people they bomb as not "their
people." Notably, the IRA bombs in London. The
American Revolutionaries didn't.
S. Alexander Jacobson i2x Media
1-212-787-1914 voice 1-603-288-1280 fax
On Thu, 10 Jan 2002, Owen Byrne wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 10:09:23AM -0700, Marty Halvorson wrote:
> > At 11:11 10-01-02, Owen Byrne wrote:
> > >Its very simple - a terrorist is on the other side, a freedom fighter is on
> > >our side. If they switch sides or win, we rehabilitate them. See the IRA
> > >and FLQ
> > >for examples.
> > Nope, for a terrorist the battle is a violent act against unsuspecting
> > people. A revolutionary commits a violent act against unsuspecting people
> > incidental to the battle with a recognized foe.
> > Peace,
> So the difference is a declaration of war? Like the US declaration of war on
> Obviously that's the solution - never declare war - then the terrorists can
> never be labelled "freedom fighters."