The Web Runs on Love, Not Greed
Fri, 04 Jan 2002 21:29:21 +0000
>The school stamped all the books (effectively making returns impossible)
>and proceeded to distribute them to
>the students. Sure enough, within about 10 minutes, students were seeking
>out the words that every middleschool kid seeks out ... you know, the
>classics, 'fuck', 'shit' , 'ass', 'bitch'. Shockingly enough, all said
>words were present .. Great editorship for a dictionary designed for SIXTH
>graders, marketed to Sixth graders and supposedly geared for their level.
>This was a well-known,oft used dictionary, and here was a very bad case of
>either poor editorship or really really shitty marketing. ..
Er .. I'm confused here. A student turns to a dictionary
to look up a word, and it is THERE, and how is this an
editorial failure?? A dictionary is used to find the
meaning of words. It seems to me a minimum obligation of
the editor is to make the dictionary as comprehensive
as reasonable for the intended audience. And this is
especially so for a student audience, since we want to
reinforce the notion that dictionaries are useful.
I can understand why the editor might not include words
such as "mediastinum" or "mumpsimus," since it is the
rare sixth grade student who encounters these. But a
sixth grader who doesn't know what "dick" means should
have a way to find out, so that he then can apply the
term correctly when describing the heads of those who
would "protect" him from the common tongue.
Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com