PDA form factor (was: Thoughts about iWalk)
Fri, 4 Jan 2002 19:21:27 +0100 (MET)
On Fri, 4 Jan 2002, Bill Kearney wrote:
> The single biggest reason all this hasn't been done before is battery
> life. Or lack thereof. Followed up quickly by storage limitations and
All of these features, yes. A subset of these features, no.
> speed; both of which impact battery life. Size is among the least of
> the hassles.
Neither weight nor size are a problem, unless you're running a power hog.
Caffeinoform gadgets are that.
> Reality check on GPS, it's not as accurate as you think. Nor is it as
I don't think, I use GPS. It's plenty accurate for me.
> fast as you think. Receiving GPS signals requires the ability to
> detect it's signals. This requires line of sight access to at least
> 30 degrees of the sky. Getting a 3D position requires even more.
Modern GPS units with hud-mounted active antenna are very adequate to the
task, and have sufficiently low power drain to not bloat your battery
overmuch. (Which actually should be a methanol fuel cell, apart from the
display another key technology missing).
> You go in a build, you don't get GPS, simple as that. Yes,
I usually don't need GPS in buildings. I need GPS most in open,
> differential GPS does exist but requires ANOTHER receiver. Thus we're
> back to battery life. So unless you want to wait for your receiver to
> 'settle' then you have to leave it on AND have line-of-sight access to
> the sky.
Dunno, GPS works, and of course you can (and should) augment it with
inertial tracking. Which could be handy for a head tracker, too...
> Another factor to consider is health. Any time you consider using
> something on a person you have to consider it's impact on their
> health. People are still freaking about about high-tension lines and
> cell phones. Personal area networks are certainly going to suffer
> from the same perceptions. Want to get freaked out? Put your cell
> phone near your monitor and then call it. Yeah, and you put it near
> your head, right? No? On a belt clip? Hmmm, any reproductive risks?
I have no problem with a 5 W HF radiator residing in a fannypack with a
directional characteristic away from the body. On the head, no, unless
it's a Faraday hard hat.
> I'm not so keen on using a portable device in constantly networked
> environment. The network is nowhere near as ubiquitous as that would
The network in the device cloud.
> require. I'd just settle for one I could use casually everyday that
> didn't require being charged more than once a week. Thus the success
> of the Palm devices.
-- Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a>
ICBMTO: N48 04'14.8'' E11 36'41.2'' http://www.leitl.org
57F9CFD3: ED90 0433 EB74 E4A9 537F CFF5 86E7 629B 57F9 CFD3